New York's transit authority has launched a campaign against "manspreading"

Images: mentakingup2muchspaceonthetrain.tumblr.com.

Even if you don't know what the word "manspreading" means, there's a good chance you would recognise it by sight. On trains, metros and buses across the globe, men (we hate to generalise, but yes, we do mean men) are attracting steely glares for the wide angle at which they position their lower limbs. There's even a Tumblr blog, Men Taking Up Too Much Space On the Train, dedicated to shaming the guilty. 

Admittedly, this issue isn't particularly high on most peoples' priority lists. Travellers do lots of annoying things on trains, and someone with three suitcases or a buggy is just as, if not more disruptive than, that guy who can't keep his legs to himself. Nonetheless, the battle for legspace has now left the internet and made it to the highest levels of transport regulation.

In late December, Mew York's Metropolitan Transport Authority launched a campaign to dissuade manspreaders. It took the form of this somewhat embarrassingly phrased sign, rolled out to subway cars across the network, and forms part of a wider campaign promoting etiquette on public transport:

If that wasn't dramatic enough, the issue subsequently made the front page of the New York TimesIn the story, Paul Fleuranges, the MTA's senior director for communications, proudly said that the sign's jocular opener was his idea: "I had them add the dude part, because I think, ‘Dude, really?’" 


Since the campaign's launch, the manspreading debate has climbed up the agenda in other cities. Similar signs have appeared in Philadelphia, where transport bosses have opted for the more confronational, “Dude It’s Rude... Two Seats – Really?” In both New York and London, intrepid female journalists tried out "woman-spreading" to guage the public's reaction (tuts and photograph-taking, mostly). A Toronto news channel noted a wave of support on Twitter for a manspreading ban aboard the city's public transport.

And around the world, people are asking the question: why manspread in the first place? Is it, as angry commenters on the Tumblr blog regularly assert, a question of anatomy? Or is it, like mansplaining, an act of pure selfishness motivated by the horrible structural forces of patriarchy? Until we have the definitive answer, the war will rage on.  

Like what you see? Why not follow CityMetric on Facebook or Twitter. Go on, we're lovely.

 
 
 
 

Covid-19 is highlighting cities' unequal access to green space

In the UK, Londoners are most likely to rely on their local park for green space, and have the best access to parks. (Leon Neal/Getty Images)

As coronavirus lockdowns ease, people are flooding back to parks – but not everyone has easy access to green space in their city.

Statistics from Google show that park attendance in countries across the globe has shot up as people have been allowed to move around their cities again.

This is especially true in urban areas, where densely populated neighbourhoods limit the size of private green space – meaning residents have to go to the park to get in touch with nature. Readers from England can use our interactive tool below to find out how much green space people have access to in their area, and how it compares to the rest of the country.

 

Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s announcement Monday that people are allowed to mingle in parks and gardens with groups of up to six people was partially following what people were doing already.

Data from mobile phones show people have been returning to parks across the UK, and also across Europe, as weather improves and lockdown eases.

People have been returning to parks across the world

Stay-at-home requirements were eased in Italy on 4 May, which led to a flood of people returning to parks.

France eased restrictions on 1 May, and the UK eased up slightly on 13 May, allowing people to sit down in public places so long as they remain socially distanced.

Other countries have seen park attendance rise without major easing of lockdown – including Canada, Spain, and the US (although states there have individual rules and some have eased restrictions).

In some countries, people never really stopped going to parks.

Authorities in the Netherlands and Germany were not as strict as other countries about their citizens visiting local parks during lockdown, while Sweden has famously been avoiding placing many restrictions on people’s daily lives.


There is a growing body of evidence to suggest that access to green space has major benefits for public health.

A recent study by researchers at the University of Exeter found that spending time in the garden is linked to similar benefits for health and wellbeing as living in wealthy areas.

People with access to a private garden also had higher psychological wellbeing, and those with an outdoor space such as a yard were more likely to meet physical activity guidelines than those without access to outdoor space. 

Separate UK research has found that living with a regular view of a green space provides health benefits worth £300 per person per year.

Access is not shared equally, however, which has important implications for equality under lockdown, and the spread of disease.

Statistics from the UK show that one in eight households has no garden, making access to parks more important.

There is a geographic inequality here. Londoners, who have the least access to private gardens, are most likely to rely on their local park for green space, and have the best access to parks. 

However the high population in the capital means that on the whole, green space per person is lower – an issue for people living in densely populated cities everywhere.

There is also an occupational inequality.

Those on low pay – including in what are statistically classed as “semi-skilled” and “unskilled” manual occupations, casual workers and those who are unemployed – are almost three times as likely as those in managerial, administrative, professional occupations to be without a garden, meaning they rely more heavily on their local park.

Britain’s parks and fields are also at significant risk of development, according to new research by the Fields in Trust charity, which shows the number of people living further than a 10-minute walk from a public park rising by 5% over the next five years. That loss of green spaces is likely to impact disadvantaged communities the most, the researchers say.

This is borne out by looking at the parts of the country that have private gardens.

The least deprived areas have the largest gardens

Though the relationship is not crystal clear, it shows at the top end: Those living in the least deprived areas have the largest private green space.

Although the risk of catching coronavirus is lower outdoors, spending time in parks among other people is undoubtedly more risky when it comes to transmitting or catching the virus than spending time in your own outdoor space. 

Access to green space is therefore another example – along with the ability to work from home and death rates – of how the burden of the pandemic has not been equally shouldered by all.

Michael Goodier is a data reporter at New Statesman Media Group, and Josh Rayman is a graphics and data visualisation developer at New Statesman Media Group.