A new map shows Transport for London's growing control of the city rail network

Mayor Boris Johnson turns another train carriage London Overground orange. Image: Getty.

Drop everything, London! Drop everything. It's finally arrived: the new London rail map is here.

Okay, so technically, we’re still waiting for Transport for London (TfL) to officially publish the new map on its own website, so that we can get the whole thing up. In the mean time, courtesy of Ben Mathis on Twitter, here's a photo of the printed verson.

Drumroll please - it's what you've all been waiting for! pic.twitter.com/f5H05QMeZX

— Ben Mathis (@binny_uk) May 19, 2015


Okay, so, some things to notice. 

1) TfL has taken over the line from Liverpool Street, heading east into Essex, and coloured it a sort of blue-y purple. For the next few years it'll be run under the “TfL Rail” brand, a sort of stop-gap, until it’s ready to plug into the (not yet finished) Crossrail.

2) Meanwhile TfL’s existing rail brand, London Overground, has taken over a swathe of the lines from Liverpool Street out to north east London and Hertfordshire. That includes the branches to Enfield Town, Cheshunt and Chingford, all of which are now orange.

3) It's also taken over the tiny branch line, right out at the eastern end of the map, connecting Romford and Upminster. That's now orange too.

4) That's left, by our count, least fivesix sets (yes, we miscounted) of entirely separate lines that are the same colour. (More, if you count all the branches.) This is a bit confusing, and possibly something someone might want to look at changing at some point, but hey, what do we know.

5) Since TfL is now running all these lines it's finally seen fit to highlight pairs of stations – in Hackney, Walthamstow and Forest Gate – that are basically next door to each other, and so serve as connections. Look:

6) Brentwood station, at the far end of the TfL Rail branche is in zone 9. This seems crazy given it's not that far from the official city limits, and so zone 7 might have seemed more appropriate.  We can only guess it’s a way of not having to reduce fares in any revenue-endangering fashion.

More important news as it breaks.


Sadiq Khan and Grant Shapps clash over free bus travel for under 18s

A London bus at Victoria station. Image: Getty.

The latest front in the row between Transport for London (TfL) and national government over how to fund the capital’s transport system: free bus travel for the under 18s.

Two weeks ago, you’ll recall, TfL came perilously close to running out of money and was forced to ask for a bail out. The government agreed, but offered less money, and with more strings attached, than the agency wanted. At present, there are a range of fare discounts – some up to 100% – available to children depending on their age and which service they’re using, provided they have the right Oyster card. One of the government’s strings, the mayor’s office says, was to end all free TfL travel for the under 18s, Oyster or no Oyster.

The Department for Transport’s line on all this is that this is about maximising capacity. Many working-age people need to use buses to get to their jobs: they’re more likely to be able to do that, while also social distancing, if those buses aren’t already full of teenagers riding for free. (DfT cited the same motivation for banning the use of the Freedom Pass, which provides free travel for the retired, at peak times.)

But in an open letter to transport secretary Grant Shapps, the mayor, Sadiq Khan, wrote that TfL believed that 30% of children who currently received free travel had a statutory entitlement to it, because they attend schools more than a certain distance from their homes. If TfL doesn’t fund this travel, London’s boroughs must, which apart from loading costs onto local government means replacing an administrative system that already exists with one that doesn’t. 

Some Labour staffers also smell Tory ideological objections to free things for young people at work. To quote Khan’s letter:

“It is abundantly clear that losing free travel would hit the poorest Londoners hardest at a time when finances are stretched more than ever... I want to make sure that families who might not have a choice but to use public transport are not further disadvantaged.”

London’s deputy mayor for transport, Heidi Alexander, is set to meet government officials next week to discuss all this. In the mean time, you can read Khan’s letter here.

UPDATE: The original version of this piece noted that the full agreement between the mayor and DfT remained mysteriously unpublished. Shortly after this story went live, the agreement appeared. Here it is.

Jonn Elledge was founding editor of CityMetric. He is on Twitter as @jonnelledge and on Facebook as JonnElledgeWrites.