Rotterdam's residents crowdfunded its new pedestrian bridge

Rotterdamites on their crowdfunded bridge. Image: ZUS.

Back in 2011, a local architecture firm decided that Rotterdam's Hofplein neighbourhood needed a bit of a boost. Architects at the firm, Zones Urbaines Sensibles (ZUS), put together a plan to open up public spaces in the area, and link up the whole thing via a bright yellow pedestrian bridge.

Like so many plans to regenerate city spaces, the concept was great - but it could well have remained just a concept. But rather than waiting for city funding, ZUS set up "I Make Rotterdam", a crowdfunding campaign for the bridge, the project's centrepiece. Each sponsor paid at least 25 Euros, and, in return, would have their chosen message inscribed on one of the bridge's planks. 

Names inscribed on the brige. Image: ZUS. 

The project went on to win the Rotterdam City Initiative competition in 2012, which acted as another financial boost.

This first phase of the project is now completed, and the bridge connects Hofplein with the city's Northern district. ZUS plans to extend the bridge, however, once the firm receives more donations.

This approach to infrastructure as both crowdfunded and flexible is very new: it suggests that in future, citizens could play a much greater role in both choosing and funding city infrastructure, which could then adapt more readily to their changing needs. Watch this space. 

Plans for the bridge from above. Image: ZUS. 



The Fire Brigades Union’s statement on Theresa May’s resignation is completely damning

Grenfell Tower. Image: Getty.

Just after 10 this morning, Theresa May announced that she would resign as Britain’s prime minister on 7 June. A mere half an hour later, a statement from Royal Institute of British Architects president Ben Derbyshire arrived in my inbox with a ping:

“The news that Theresa May will step down as Prime Minister leaves the country in limbo while the clock ticks down to the latest deadline of 31 October. While much is uncertain, one thing remains clear – a no deal is no option for architecture or the wider construction sector. Whoever becomes the next Prime Minister must focus on taking the country forward with policies beyond Brexit that tackle the major challenges facing the country such as the housing crisis and climate change emergency.”

I was a bit baffled by this – why would the architecture profession try to get its thoughts into a political story? But then Merlin Fulcher of Architects Journal put me right:

Well you know construction is a larger contributor to GDP than financial services, and most of the work UK architects do is for export, and at least half of the largest practice (Foster + Partners) are EU, so there's a lot at stake

— Merlin Fulcher (@merlinfulcher) May 24, 2019

So, the thoughts of the RIBA president are an entirely legitimate thing to send to any construction sector-adjacent journalists who might be writing about today’s big news, and frankly I felt a little silly.

Someone else who should be feeling more than a little silly, though, is Theresa May herself. When listing her government’s achievements, such as they were, she included, setting up “the independent public inquiry into the tragedy at Grenfell Tower” – a fire in a West London public housing block in June 2017 – “to search for the truth, so nothing like it can ever happen again, and so the people who lost their lives that night are never forgotten”.

Matt Wrack, general secretary of the Fire Brigades Union, is having precisely none of this. Here’s his statement:

“Many of the underlying issues at Grenfell were due to unsafe conditions that had been allowed to fester under Tory governments and a council for which Theresa May bears ultimate responsibility. The inquiry she launched has kicked scrutiny of corporate and government interests into the long-grass, denying families and survivors justice, while allowing business as usual to continue for the wealthy. For the outgoing Prime Minister to suggest that her awful response to Grenfell is a proud part of her legacy is, frankly, disgraceful.”

A total of 72 people died in the Grenfell fire. At time of writing, nobody has been prosecuted.

Jonn Elledge is editor of CityMetric and the assistant editor of the New Statesman. He is on Twitter as @jonnelledge and on Facebook as JonnElledgeWrites.

Want more of this stuff? Follow CityMetric on Twitter or Facebook.