Climate change means delta cities face a rising risk from sinking land – even the rich ones

A satellite image of the Mississippi Delta. Image: NASA.

Coastal deltas are becoming more at risk of flooding – due to land subsidence, or the gradual sinking of the Earth’s surface, or sea-level rise.

Conventional protective infrastructure, such as levees, may reduce current risk. But it doesn’t address underlying causes of subsidence, potentially leading to far greater challenges in the future.

The world’s deltas are home to over 340m people, a population greater than that of the United States. These delta communities are highly at risk from flooding, and future sea-level rise will make these risks worse. Sea-level rise associated with climate change is rightly considered a major threat to all coastal communities around the world – but deltas face additional challenges due to their unique geological characteristics.

In a study published in the journal Science, my colleagues and I used a suite of global datasets to estimate how and where sea-level rise and land subsidence will most increase delta flood risk. Several relatively low-risk deltas in wealthy nations, including the Mississippi and Rhine deltas, would face considerable risk, were it not for their capacity for investment in protective infrastructure.

However, when considering a potential future with increased infrastructure costs, these deltas may be exposed to dramatically higher risks. A clear understanding of risk, both now and those likely in the future, is a critical first step toward maintaining healthy, livable, and sustainable deltas.

Relative sea-level rise

Deltas are formed where rivers, laden with sediment eroded from land upstream, enter the sea and deposit sediments. Over time, these sediments naturally compact under the weight of new, overlying sediments.

However, compaction continues even if the supply of new sediment is disrupted. That results in subsidence, or sinking, of the land. Dams and artificial reservoirs on the upstream river network trap sediment, reducing supply to the coast. Flood protections and river channelisation reduce the distribution of what little sediment does reach the delta.

Over four decades, significant parts of land have been lost to the sea, increasing flooding risk. Image: Zachary Tessler/data from USGS and NASA.

Other man-made processes can accelerate subsidence, from the sheer weight of overlying urban development to the extraction of groundwater, oil, and gas.

The combination of sea-level rise, which affects coastlines everywhere, and land subsidence, which is particularly acute in deltas, is called relative sea-level rise (RSLR).

To better quantify the role RSLR plays in increasing flood risk in deltas across the globe, we need to consider how coastal communities are harmed by flood events.

Putting a figure on risk

A common model for risk in the insurance industry is to consider the “expected loss” over some time period. In the context of deltas, loss occurs when three conditions are met:

  • a hazardous event occurs (hazard);
  • exposing some people to hazardous conditions (exposure);
  • and resulting in some degree of harm (vulnerability).

A perfect model of delta risk would identify the likelihood of all possible hazardous events. It would then map out exactly who and what would be exposed to flood conditions for each of those events. And it would quantify the extent to which those people and infrastructure would be harmed. Because of reducing land elevation, relative sea-level rise effectively increases the number of people exposed to a given flood.

Delta areas will face the choice of maintaining their current level of protection with increasing financial costs, or holding their level of spending constant with increasing risks

In our analysis we created a series of risk indexes, based on global remote sensing and numerical modeling data, to estimate how RSLR is impacting flood risk across the globe.

The highest risk increases due to RSLR are found in the Krishna (India), Ganges-Brahmaputra (Bangladesh), and Brahmani (India) deltas. All these have very high estimated RSLR rates, moderate-to-high occurrence of hazardous events, and very high vulnerability.

Several deltas with moderate-to-high RSLR and hazardous event scores nonetheless have quite stable risk levels over time. These deltas, such as the Mississippi (US) and the Rhine (Netherlands), are located in wealthier, more developed nations, and have the capacity to invest in protective infrastructure, lowering their vulnerability.

When the levee is breached: Iowa in 2011. Image: US Army Corps of Engineers, CC BY.

The predominate strategies used by wealthy deltas for risk-reduction involve large-scale engineering projects such as dikes, levees, storm surge barriers, and pumping stations. Note that none of these technologies address the root cause of increasing risk – sinking land and sea-level rise.

Over time, land subsidence and sea-level rise will either increase delta risk, or necessitate increasingly large protective measures. Conventional engineered defense structures require energy and large sums of money to construct, operate, and maintain. Energy costs are forecast by the US Energy Information Administration to outpace GDP growth into the middle of this century. Delta areas will face the choice of maintaining their current level of protection with increasing financial costs, or holding their level of spending constant with increasing risks.

These challenges will be particularly acute in deltas that are highly exposed to hazards and have high rates of RSLR, but low vulnerability associated with the financial means to build infrastructure. The Mississippi (US), Rhine (Netherlands), Chao Phraya (Thailand), and Yangtze (China) stand out due to their underlying exposure to hazardous events, and high RSLR.

Selective flooding?

While conventional engineered infrastructure absolutely reduces current risks, it is critical to also directly reduce rates of land subsidence and sea-level rise. Otherwise, risk-reductions today come at the expense of more steeply increased risks in the future.

Reducing sea-level rise will require global action to slow climate-change. However, local and regional actions targeting land subsidence rates can have a more direct and immediate impact. Technologies for reducing the buildup of sediment behind dams can increase the delivery of sediment to deltas, but most important is allowing sediment-laden freshwater to reach the delta surface.

How can regions slow subsidence? Controlled diversions and dike breaches are options for selectively allowing parts of the delta to flood, bringing sediment with it. This is currently being debated in the Mississippi Delta, for instance, and research based on earlier diversions during flood events suggests this will slow land loss. Also, restored coastal wetlands increase sediment retention, and can reduce the impact of storm surges.

The technical, and political, challenges may be large – but confronting them today will be easier, and less risky, than facing the consequences tomorrow. The Conversation

Zachary Tessler is a postdoctoral researcher at the Environmental Crossroads Initiative at City University of New York.

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.

 
 
 
 

CityMetric is now City Monitor! Come see us at our new home

City Monitor is now live in beta at citymonitor.ai.

CityMetric is now City Monitor, a name that reflects both a ramping up of our ambitions as well as our membership in a network of like-minded publications from New Statesman Media Group. Our new site is now live in beta, so please visit us there going forward. Here’s what CityMetric readers should know about this exciting transition.  

Regular CityMetric readers may have already noticed a few changes around here since the spring. CityMetric’s beloved founding editor, Jonn Elledge, has moved on to some new adventures, and a new team has formed to take the site into the future. It’s led by yours truly – I’m Sommer Mathis, the editor-in-chief of City Monitor. Hello!

My background includes having served as the founding editor of CityLab, editor-in-chief of Atlas Obscura, and editor-in-chief of DCist, a local news publication in the District of Columbia. I’ve been reporting on and writing about cities in one way or another for the past 15 years. To me, there is no more important story in the world right now than how cities are changing and adapting to an increasingly challenging global landscape. The majority of the world’s population lives in cities, and if we’re ever going to be able to tackle the most pressing issues currently facing our planet – the climate emergency, rising inequality, the Covid-19 pandemic ­­­– cities are going to have to lead the way.

That’s why City Monitor is now a global publication dedicated to the future of cities everywhere – not just in the UK (nor for that matter just in the US, where I live). Our mission is to help our readers, many of whom are in leadership positions around the globe, navigate how cities are changing and discover what’s next in the world of urban policy. We’ll do that through original reporting, expert opinion and most crucially, a data-driven approach that emphasises evidence and rigorous analysis. We want to arm local decision-makers and those they work in concert with – whether that’s elected officials, bureaucratic leaders, policy advocates, neighbourhood activists, academics and researchers, entrepreneurs, or plain-old engaged citizens – with real insights and potential answers to tough problems. Subjects we cover include transportation, infrastructure, housing, urban design, public safety, the environment, the economy, and much more.

The City Monitor team is made up of some of the most experienced urban policy journalists in the world. Our managing editor is Adam Sneed, also a CityLab alum where he served as a senior associate editor. Before that he was a technology reporter at Politico. Allison Arieff is City Monitor’s senior editor. She was previously editorial director of the urban planning and policy think tank SPUR, as well as a contributing columnist for The New York Times. Staff writer Jake Blumgart most recently covered development, housing and politics for WHYY, the local public radio station in Philadelphia. And our data reporter is Alexandra Kanik, whose previous roles include data reporting for Louisville Public Media in Kentucky and PublicSource in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Our team will continue to grow in the coming weeks, and we’ll also be collaborating closely with our editorial colleagues across New Statesman Media Group. In fact, we’re launching a whole network of new publications, covering topics such as the clean energy transition, foreign direct investment, technology, banks and more. Many of these sectors will frequently overlap with our cities coverage, and a key part of our plan is make the most of the expertise that all of these newsrooms combined will bring to bear on our journalism.

Please visit citymonitor.ai going forward, where you can also sign up for our free email newsletter.


As for CityMetric, some of its archives have already been moved over to the new website, and the rest will follow not long after. If you’re looking for a favourite piece from CityMetric’s past, for a time you’ll still be able to find it here, but before long the whole archive will move over to City Monitor.

On behalf of the City Monitor team, I’m thrilled to invite you to come along for the ride at our new digs. You can follow City Monitor on LinkedIn and on Twitter. If you’re interested in learning more about the potential for a commercial partnership with City Monitor, please get in touch with our director of partnerships, Joe Maughan.

I want to thank and congratulate Jonn Elledge on a brilliant run. Everything we do from here on out will be building on the legacy of his work, and the community that he built here at CityMetric. Cheers, Jonn!

To our readers, on behalf of the City Monitor team, thank you from all of us for being such loyal CityMetric fans. We couldn’t have done any of this without you.

Sommer Mathis is editor-in-chief of City Monitor.