Whether it's Gatwick or Heathrow that gets the nod, the Airports Commission will have failed

Ready for take off? Gatwick Airport stands empty after a week of closures in 2010. Image: Getty.

The Airports Commission delivers its final report tomorrow. Three long years after setting out to find the “answer” to the UK’s airport expansion woes, Howard Davies unveils his recommendations.

The Commission was launched in 2012 with the aim of solving government inertia and a divided political community, by stating once and for all whether the UK needed greater airports capacity – and if so, where it should be. Three years, and £20m, later, we are finally at the finish line and the report will soon be in the public domain.

And yet by its most important objective the commission could well have already failed. As an exercise in finding a way forward it may achieve nothing at all.

The government will likely receive from Davies a technocratic document making the case for Heathrow expansion. The Commission’s modelling suggests that it would benefit the UK economy by up to £214bn, over £80bn more than the comparative Gatwick assessment; it’ll probably also highlight the fact that planes are becoming quieter as technology advances.

But the local loyalties of a few Tory big beasts will make it almost impossible to implement. Theresa May, Justine Greening and Philip Hammond are among cabinet members whose constituencies would be made noisier by Heathrow expansion; so would that of Boris Johnson. All have pledged to oppose new flightpaths over their constituents, no matter what the recommendations of the Commission.

Source: Airports Commission Discussion Paper 5.

The next mayor of London will also have a big influence over where to expand capacity, and here we see the same local concerns taking hold. Denouncer-in-chief Zac Goldsmith, who represents his party’s best chance for 2016 mayoral election, might well resign from the party before countenancing new flight paths across his current Richmond constituency. Cameron will surely avoid the scenario altogether: to directly provoke senior cabinet members and a Conservative mayor looks like a political folly.


It seems unlikely that a Labour Mayor would push for anything different. Speaking at a recent Centre for London event, one of the frontrunners for the party’s nomination Sadiq Khan came under fire from his fellow contenders for his about-face on airports. Having supported Heathrow expansion as a minister under Gordon Brown, it seems that Khan has woken up to the damage such a stance could do to his London mayoral bid – especially if Zac Goldsmith’s name appears on the ballot.

The fact that Khan chose to declare his position just weeks before the Airports Commission reported illustrates the futility of this technocratic assessment, when set against the sheer bloody-minded politics of it all.

(Incidentally Tessa Jowell, Khan’s big rival for the Labour nomination and another who previously backed Heathrow, has suggested she wants to wait and see what the Commission says. It will be interesting to see whether in this debate she stakes a claim as the pro-business opposition to “Green Tory” Goldsmith.)

The Airports Commission has been tempered by politics since day one. Such is its sensitivity that those with the power to make a decision have done all they can to avoid it, pushing back the final report so as to avoid making it a general election issue. Had the Commission been given teeth to implement its recommendations –and crucially backed by all political parties to do so – then significant progress would have been made. Instead the debate rumbles on and is unlikely to come to a satisfactory conclusion any time soon.

Despite its importance to the whole country the airports debate is dominated by a tiny percentage of the electorate from a corner of London and the South East, and the politicians whom they influence. And those politicians have so much at stake, so much invested in their communities and their careers, that they default to convenient NIMBYism.

The next mayor of London may well win an election by opposing Heathrow expansion – and, if Davies is to be believed, the capital and the rest of the country would be poorer for it.

All the noises to have come from the Commission so far indicates that it will primarily recommend Heathrow expansion. But messy local politics suggests that when spades do eventually break ground it’ll be the pro-Gatwick lobby smiling.

Ed Hickey is external affairs officer at the Centre for London. He tweets as @ed_hick.

 
 
 
 

Coming soon: CityMetric will relaunch as City Monitor, a new publication dedicated to the future of cities

Coming soon!

Later this month, CityMetric will be relaunching with an entirely new look and identity, as well as an expanded editorial mission. We’ll become City Monitor, a name that reflects both a ramping up of our ambitions as well as our membership in a network of like-minded publications coming soon from New Statesman Media Group. We can’t wait to share the new website with you, but in the meantime, here’s what CityMetric readers should know about what to expect from this exciting transition.  

Regular CityMetric readers may have already noticed a few changes around here since the spring. CityMetric’s beloved founding editor, Jonn Elledge, has moved on to some new adventures, and a new team has formed to take the site into the future. It’s led by yours truly – I’m Sommer Mathis, the editor-in-chief of City Monitor. Hello!

My background includes having served as the founding editor of CityLab, editor-in-chief of Atlas Obscura, and editor-in-chief of DCist, a local news publication in the District of Columbia. I’ve been reporting on and writing about cities in one way or another for the past 15 years. To me, there is no more important story in the world right now than how cities are changing and adapting to an increasingly challenging global landscape. The majority of the world’s population lives in cities, and if we’re ever going to be able to tackle the most pressing issues currently facing our planet – the climate emergency, rising inequality, the Covid-19 pandemic ­­­– cities are going to have to lead the way.

That’s why City Monitor is going to be a global publication dedicated to the future of cities everywhere – not just in the UK (nor for that matter just in the US, where I live). Our mission will be to help our readers, many of whom are in leadership positions around the globe, navigate how cities are changing and discover what’s next in the world of urban policy. We’ll do that through original reporting, expert opinion and most crucially, a data-driven approach that emphasises evidence and rigorous analysis. We want to arm local decision-makers and those they work in concert with – whether that’s elected officials, bureaucratic leaders, policy advocates, neighbourhood activists, academics and researchers, entrepreneurs, or plain-old engaged citizens – with real insights and potential answers to tough problems. Subjects we’ll cover include transportation, infrastructure, housing, urban design, public safety, the environment, the economy, and much more.

The City Monitor team is made up of some of the most experienced urban policy journalists in the world. Our managing editor is Adam Sneed, also a CityLab alum where he served as a senior associate editor. Before that he was a technology reporter at Politico. Allison Arieff is City Monitor’s senior editor. She was previously editorial director of the urban planning and policy think tank SPUR, as well as a contributing columnist for The New York Times. Staff writer Jake Blumgart most recently covered development, housing, and politics for WHYY, the local public radio station in Philadelphia. And our data reporter is Alexandra Kanik, whose previous roles include data reporting for Louisville Public Media in Kentucky and PublicSource in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Our team will continue to grow in the coming weeks, and we’ll also be collaborating closely with our editorial colleagues across New Statesman Media Group. In fact, we’re launching a whole network of new publications this fall, covering topics such as the clean energy transition, foreign direct investment, technology, banks and more. Many of these sectors will frequently overlap with our cities coverage, and a key part of our plan is make the most of the expertise that all of these newsrooms combined will bring to bear on our journalism.

City Monitor will go live later this month. In the meantime, please visit citymonitor.ai to sign up for our forthcoming email newsletter.


As for CityMetric, some of its archives have already been moved over to the new website, and the rest will follow not long after. If you’re looking for a favourite piece from CityMetric’s past, for a time you’ll still be able to find it here, but before long the whole archive will move over to City Monitor.

On behalf of the City Monitor team, I’m thrilled to invite you to come along for the ride at our forthcoming digs. You can already follow City Monitor on LinkedIn, and on Twitter, sign up or keep following our existing account, which will switch over to our new name shortly. If you’re interested in learning more about the potential for a commercial partnership with City Monitor, please get in touch with our director of partnerships, Joe Maughan.

I want to thank and congratulate Jonn Elledge on a brilliant run. Everything we do from here on out will be building on the legacy of his work, and the community that he built here at CityMetric. Cheers, Jonn!

In the meantime, stay tuned, and thank you from all of us for being a loyal CityMetric reader. We couldn’t have done any of this without you.

Sommer Mathis is editor-in-chief of City Monitor.