Budget: George Osborne should scrap buy-to-let mortgage tax relief and fund more homes

For hard working landlords. Chancellor George Osborne and friend visit a residential construction site in London, 2011. Image: Getty.

You’ve probably heard about this pesky housing crisis we have in the UK. We have the most expensive rents in Europe, house prices are once again going berserk and we’re still building less than half the 300,000 homes per year we ought to be constructing. It’s all too depressing if you’re one of the millions of young working people totally priced out of a secure home at an affordable price.

It’s not that the government is doing nothing. One of its best initiatives is the Affordable Homes Programme, which directly funds new housebuilding for below market rate tenures. The problem is that it is only seeing a £1.7bn investment spread over the next three years. This won’t make anywhere near enough of a dent in the huge housing shortage.

However, the UK just elected a Conservative government on a platform to get the public finances into surplus: asking for more money when they are looking to make spending reductions is pretty pointless. We need to look at raising more tax revenue from the existing housing market to fund more affordable homes.

Handily there’s one big source of potential tax revenue that would do just the trick. Landlords who use buy-to-let mortgages to buy up houses currently get tax relief on their mortgage interest. A similar tax relief for homeowners was abolished back in 2000, but buy-to-let landlords kept this perk.

Since then buy-to-let lending has boomed. The tax allowance has now risen to an astonishing £6.3bn per year. That’s the sort of number that needs repeating in bold: £6.3 billion!

So why should this tax relief in particular be shown the door? There are three reasons:

1. Landlords are basically investors. They buy an asset (a house), get a yield from it (rental income) and hope to make a capital gain. You can’t ordinarily get tax breaks for debt used to fund other speculative investments; landlords should not be treated any differently.

2. The Bank of England is starting to fret. Its latest financial stability report bluntly stated that “buy-to-let lending could pose a risk to financial stability” and highlighted the tendency for buy-to-let landlords to use interest-only mortgages. A tax perk on mortgage interest obviously encourages interest-only repayments. I don’t know why any Chancellor with a “long term economic plan” would want to keep a tax incentive for behaviour that threatens financial stability.

3. The Conservatives won the election on a promise to “double the number of first-time buyers”, and having secured victory David Cameron has asserted that “as a majority government we will be able to deliver all of [our manifesto]”. 

However the current borrowing trends aren’t encouraging. The latest numbers show a 10 per cent drop in the number of first-time buyer mortgages, but a rise of 8 per cent for buy-to-let mortgages. With the assistance of an exclusive tax break, landlords are able to outbid more and more first-time buyers. Abolishing the relief will help tip the scales back towards first-time buyers, help the Conservatives keep their promise and start to rebuild a property-owning democracy.

With the revenue raised by getting rid of this relief, the government could easily afford to treble the size of the next Affordable Homes Programme, giving a much-needed boost to the British construction industry, creating thousands of new jobs and getting the homes we urgently need built.

The Conservatives like to call themselves “the party of homeownership”; but this doesn’t mean anything unless they back aspiring first-time buyers over and above their landlord competition. Buy-to-let mortgages don’t deserve encouragement. It’s time for this tax break to go.

UPDATE FROM THE EDITOR: In his Budget today, chancellor George Osborne announced that he was capping the level of mortgage relief available to landlords at the basic rate of tax (20 per cent). That essentially means a cut to the subsidies available to anyone who currently pays higher rate taxes. The change will be introduced over a four-year period from April 2017. 

Duncan Stott, the author of this piece, commented on the change in a statement:

For the Conservatives to be pro-homeownership, it means they must take aaction against buy-to-let. We hope this excellent move to bring fairness to mortgage taxation will be just the beginning of the reforms needed to get the housing market into a fit shape for first-time buyers.

Duncan Stott is director of the affordable housing campaign Priced Out.


CityMetric is now City Monitor! Come see us at our new home

City Monitor is now live in beta at citymonitor.ai.

CityMetric is now City Monitor, a name that reflects both a ramping up of our ambitions as well as our membership in a network of like-minded publications from New Statesman Media Group. Our new site is now live in beta, so please visit us there going forward. Here’s what CityMetric readers should know about this exciting transition.  

Regular CityMetric readers may have already noticed a few changes around here since the spring. CityMetric’s beloved founding editor, Jonn Elledge, has moved on to some new adventures, and a new team has formed to take the site into the future. It’s led by yours truly – I’m Sommer Mathis, the editor-in-chief of City Monitor. Hello!

My background includes having served as the founding editor of CityLab, editor-in-chief of Atlas Obscura, and editor-in-chief of DCist, a local news publication in the District of Columbia. I’ve been reporting on and writing about cities in one way or another for the past 15 years. To me, there is no more important story in the world right now than how cities are changing and adapting to an increasingly challenging global landscape. The majority of the world’s population lives in cities, and if we’re ever going to be able to tackle the most pressing issues currently facing our planet – the climate emergency, rising inequality, the Covid-19 pandemic ­­­– cities are going to have to lead the way.

That’s why City Monitor is now a global publication dedicated to the future of cities everywhere – not just in the UK (nor for that matter just in the US, where I live). Our mission is to help our readers, many of whom are in leadership positions around the globe, navigate how cities are changing and discover what’s next in the world of urban policy. We’ll do that through original reporting, expert opinion and most crucially, a data-driven approach that emphasises evidence and rigorous analysis. We want to arm local decision-makers and those they work in concert with – whether that’s elected officials, bureaucratic leaders, policy advocates, neighbourhood activists, academics and researchers, entrepreneurs, or plain-old engaged citizens – with real insights and potential answers to tough problems. Subjects we cover include transportation, infrastructure, housing, urban design, public safety, the environment, the economy, and much more.

The City Monitor team is made up of some of the most experienced urban policy journalists in the world. Our managing editor is Adam Sneed, also a CityLab alum where he served as a senior associate editor. Before that he was a technology reporter at Politico. Allison Arieff is City Monitor’s senior editor. She was previously editorial director of the urban planning and policy think tank SPUR, as well as a contributing columnist for The New York Times. Staff writer Jake Blumgart most recently covered development, housing and politics for WHYY, the local public radio station in Philadelphia. And our data reporter is Alexandra Kanik, whose previous roles include data reporting for Louisville Public Media in Kentucky and PublicSource in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Our team will continue to grow in the coming weeks, and we’ll also be collaborating closely with our editorial colleagues across New Statesman Media Group. In fact, we’re launching a whole network of new publications, covering topics such as the clean energy transition, foreign direct investment, technology, banks and more. Many of these sectors will frequently overlap with our cities coverage, and a key part of our plan is make the most of the expertise that all of these newsrooms combined will bring to bear on our journalism.

Please visit citymonitor.ai going forward, where you can also sign up for our free email newsletter.

As for CityMetric, some of its archives have already been moved over to the new website, and the rest will follow not long after. If you’re looking for a favourite piece from CityMetric’s past, for a time you’ll still be able to find it here, but before long the whole archive will move over to City Monitor.

On behalf of the City Monitor team, I’m thrilled to invite you to come along for the ride at our new digs. You can follow City Monitor on LinkedIn and on Twitter. If you’re interested in learning more about the potential for a commercial partnership with City Monitor, please get in touch with our director of partnerships, Joe Maughan.

I want to thank and congratulate Jonn Elledge on a brilliant run. Everything we do from here on out will be building on the legacy of his work, and the community that he built here at CityMetric. Cheers, Jonn!

To our readers, on behalf of the City Monitor team, thank you from all of us for being such loyal CityMetric fans. We couldn’t have done any of this without you.

Sommer Mathis is editor-in-chief of City Monitor.