Britain has a rural housing crisis – and Right To Buy is accelerating it

Some houses, in the Lake District, where there aren't enough houses. Image: Getty.

The countryside is great. Everyone enjoys getting out of the city, strolling up the rolling hills, breathing in the fresh air.

But it’s also where millions of people live and work. In economic terms, rural areas still provide nearly a third of Britain’s Gross Value Added (GVA). And farming underpins the UK’s largest manufacturing sector: food manufacturing is worth more than aerospace and automobiles combined, and 13 per cent of the country’s work force works somewhere in the food chain.

But rural areas also face problems that’ll be familiar to those living in many cities: there is a major housing crisis in rural England.

Allowing people to live close to where they work is critical in rural areas, where public transport links are often poor or non-existent. Without access to housing – especially housing suitable for younger people – rural businesses will struggle to attract quality employees. The crisis holds back economic development, as well as community well-being

Traditionally council houses and housing associations have provided affordable housing. But in villages of fewer than 3,000 people these now represent only 8 per cent of the housing stock (compared to around 20 per cent in urban areas). It is vital that this stock of houses is protected – and the government’s proposed extension of Right to Buy places them at serious risk.

We have already seen this stock dwindle: Right to Buy sales in rural districts have accelerated, from 2.4 homes per 1,000 in 2012 to 10 per 1,000 today. And for every eight homes sold, just one has been replaced. The extension of Right to Buy to housing associations is likely to further decrease the already low level of affordable housing in rural communities.

The extension of Right to Buy is meant to include compensation for housing associations and one-for-one replacement of affordable homes purchased through the scheme. The funding for this is supposed to come from the sale of high value, vacant, local authority housing stock – something government predicts will generate £4.5bn nationwide.

But 35 per cent of rural authorities own no housing, and a further 25 per cent own fewer than 50 houses. With the higher planning and construction costs associated with providing affordable rural housing, and fewer suitable sites available than in urban areas, it is very difficult to see how the government will achieve the one-for-one ratio it promised.

The majority of rural affordable housing is covered by legal agreements that secure homes as affordable in perpetuity (i.e. forever). Often, landowners have offered land at a discount from market value because they recognise the need to provide affordable housing to meet local need. These arrangements are a pre-requisite to landowners being willing to sell sites, and schemes gaining local community support.

Research conducted as part of the rural policy review found that 70 per cent of housing associations said more than half their homes in villages of less than 3,000 people were covered by these agreements; 94 per cent of local authorities said they applied perpetuity arrangements to affordable houses in villages.

What this means is that, if affordable housing can no longer be protected in perpetuity, land owners are less likely to offer land at discount rates – and it will become harder to gain planning permission. Some 41 per cent of surveyed local authorities thought Right to Buy without exemptions will have a “significant” to “devastating” impact.

There remains an affordability gap in rural areas. House prices are on average 26 per cent higher than in urban areas (excluding London), but median earnings are £4,600 lower. The Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs’ statistical digest of rural England found the average lower quartile house price was 8.4 times the average lower quartile annual earning. So a significant proportion of the rural population is unlikely to be able to access market housing in the foreseeable future.

While government plans such as starter homes are welcome, they can’t be allowed to replace genuinely affordable housing. Homes need to be affordable at the wages workers can earn, not just based on the rates they can sell for in the market.

Affordable housing is essential to the vitality and diversity of the countryside, as well as the long term strength of the rural economy. The government must make sure their Right to Buy rules are rural-proofed – and, if necessary, exempt areas where replacements are unlikely to be found.

Oliver Savory is a parliamentary advisor at the National Farmers’ Union. 


CityMetric is now City Monitor! Come see us at our new home

City Monitor is now live in beta at

CityMetric is now City Monitor, a name that reflects both a ramping up of our ambitions as well as our membership in a network of like-minded publications from New Statesman Media Group. Our new site is now live in beta, so please visit us there going forward. Here’s what CityMetric readers should know about this exciting transition.  

Regular CityMetric readers may have already noticed a few changes around here since the spring. CityMetric’s beloved founding editor, Jonn Elledge, has moved on to some new adventures, and a new team has formed to take the site into the future. It’s led by yours truly – I’m Sommer Mathis, the editor-in-chief of City Monitor. Hello!

My background includes having served as the founding editor of CityLab, editor-in-chief of Atlas Obscura, and editor-in-chief of DCist, a local news publication in the District of Columbia. I’ve been reporting on and writing about cities in one way or another for the past 15 years. To me, there is no more important story in the world right now than how cities are changing and adapting to an increasingly challenging global landscape. The majority of the world’s population lives in cities, and if we’re ever going to be able to tackle the most pressing issues currently facing our planet – the climate emergency, rising inequality, the Covid-19 pandemic ­­­– cities are going to have to lead the way.

That’s why City Monitor is now a global publication dedicated to the future of cities everywhere – not just in the UK (nor for that matter just in the US, where I live). Our mission is to help our readers, many of whom are in leadership positions around the globe, navigate how cities are changing and discover what’s next in the world of urban policy. We’ll do that through original reporting, expert opinion and most crucially, a data-driven approach that emphasises evidence and rigorous analysis. We want to arm local decision-makers and those they work in concert with – whether that’s elected officials, bureaucratic leaders, policy advocates, neighbourhood activists, academics and researchers, entrepreneurs, or plain-old engaged citizens – with real insights and potential answers to tough problems. Subjects we cover include transportation, infrastructure, housing, urban design, public safety, the environment, the economy, and much more.

The City Monitor team is made up of some of the most experienced urban policy journalists in the world. Our managing editor is Adam Sneed, also a CityLab alum where he served as a senior associate editor. Before that he was a technology reporter at Politico. Allison Arieff is City Monitor’s senior editor. She was previously editorial director of the urban planning and policy think tank SPUR, as well as a contributing columnist for The New York Times. Staff writer Jake Blumgart most recently covered development, housing and politics for WHYY, the local public radio station in Philadelphia. And our data reporter is Alexandra Kanik, whose previous roles include data reporting for Louisville Public Media in Kentucky and PublicSource in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Our team will continue to grow in the coming weeks, and we’ll also be collaborating closely with our editorial colleagues across New Statesman Media Group. In fact, we’re launching a whole network of new publications, covering topics such as the clean energy transition, foreign direct investment, technology, banks and more. Many of these sectors will frequently overlap with our cities coverage, and a key part of our plan is make the most of the expertise that all of these newsrooms combined will bring to bear on our journalism.

Please visit going forward, where you can also sign up for our free email newsletter.

As for CityMetric, some of its archives have already been moved over to the new website, and the rest will follow not long after. If you’re looking for a favourite piece from CityMetric’s past, for a time you’ll still be able to find it here, but before long the whole archive will move over to City Monitor.

On behalf of the City Monitor team, I’m thrilled to invite you to come along for the ride at our new digs. You can follow City Monitor on LinkedIn and on Twitter. If you’re interested in learning more about the potential for a commercial partnership with City Monitor, please get in touch with our director of partnerships, Joe Maughan.

I want to thank and congratulate Jonn Elledge on a brilliant run. Everything we do from here on out will be building on the legacy of his work, and the community that he built here at CityMetric. Cheers, Jonn!

To our readers, on behalf of the City Monitor team, thank you from all of us for being such loyal CityMetric fans. We couldn’t have done any of this without you.

Sommer Mathis is editor-in-chief of City Monitor.