What should we call the collection of islands on which the UK and Ireland happen to sit?

These islands. Image: Google.

There’s a headline that got me in trouble a while back. I thought it was pretty innocuous, so was surprised when people kicked off, but nonetheless they did. See if you can guess what they were angry about:

“Dublin offers the best quality of life in the British Isles. But can its economy withstand Brexit?

See the problem? I bet you can if you’re Irish.

The problematic phrase is “British Isles”, and as I said, I’d always assumed it to be pretty innocuous.  You might argue that that’s because I grew up in Britain, but I don’t think that’s the whole story. The two big and several thousand small islands that belong to the archipelago off the coast of North West Europe are actually known as the British Isles across the English-speaking world, and they’re Les îles Britanniques in France, too. Consequently, that’s how they’re generally referred to in news reports pretty much all over the world; it’s what their Wikipedia page is called, too.

The problem, as I hinted, is how the phrase reads in Ireland. The word “British”, after all, can also be followed by “Empire”, and Ireland had a pretty appalling experience of empire. To find that nearly a century after independence the country is still sometimes described using the name of the colonial oppressor must, on the whole, be pretty galling.

And so, the Irish government doesn’t recognise the term, and tries to discourage its use. So, I learned when I used it in a headline, do a lot of Irish people. Which, to be fair, seems pretty reasonable: if someone had starved my great-great-grandparents to death, I’d probably prefer not to be described using their name, either.

Here’s the problem, though: there is not currently a widely recognisable alternative term. A number have been suggested – but, well, look:

“Dublin offers the best quality of life in the Atlantic Archipelago”

Where?

“Dublin offers the best quality of life in the  Anglo-Celtic Isles”

Sorry, what?

“Dublin offers the best quality of life in the Islands of the North Atlantic”

What, like, Greenland?

Official government documents – back before Brexit, when it didn’t seem to be official British government policy to alienate Ireland at every available opportunity – tended to avoid the controversy by referring simply to “these islands”. That’s actually a rather lovely phrase, but while that may work in a context where the identity of “these” islands is clear, it’s not much use to an online media organisation whose output might pop up on Google searches made in Albuquerque or Afghanistan. 

By the same token we have a lot more readers in the United Kingdom than we do in the Republic of Ireland – not least because there are a lot more people in the United Kingdom than in the Republic of Ireland. There are something like 4.8m people in the Republic. Even if you were to assume that half the population of Northern Ireland finds the term “British Isles” offensive too, as seems probable, that’s still only about 5.7m people.

There are more than ten times that, around 61m, on the island of Great Britain. Is it really worth avoiding a term familiar around the world, purely because it’s offensive to such a small number?


Well... yes, actually, I think it is. Because while Britain may have largely forgotten its terrible record in Ireland, that doesn’t get us off the hook. Because the Brexit negotiations have been a reminder that random bouts of rudeness towards Ireland is the mark of an arsehole. And because it’s generally a good thing not to go about pointlessly pissing people off if you can avoid it.

Since none of the alternatives have so far gained any real currency, I suppose we shall have to describe the archipelago, when it comes up, as “the UK and Ireland”. That’s not ideal, if I’m honest –it’s a political label rather than a geographical one, it doesn’t quite fit (the Isle of Man is not technically part of either), and what’s more it’s just plain ugly. 

But as our occasional Dublin correspondent Aoife Moriarty put it when I quizzed her on her thoughts about all this, “I know it’s ugly – but so is history.” It’s a fair point. So until one of the other phrases becomes generally recognisable I supposed we’re stuck with it.

If you have a better idea, mind, do let me know. 

Jonn Elledge is the editor of CityMetric. He is on Twitter as @jonnelledge and also has a Facebook page now for some reason. 

Want more of this stuff? Follow CityMetric on Twitter or Facebook.    

 
 
 
 

CityMetric is now City Monitor! Come see us at our new home

City Monitor is now live in beta at citymonitor.ai.

CityMetric is now City Monitor, a name that reflects both a ramping up of our ambitions as well as our membership in a network of like-minded publications from New Statesman Media Group. Our new site is now live in beta, so please visit us there going forward. Here’s what CityMetric readers should know about this exciting transition.  

Regular CityMetric readers may have already noticed a few changes around here since the spring. CityMetric’s beloved founding editor, Jonn Elledge, has moved on to some new adventures, and a new team has formed to take the site into the future. It’s led by yours truly – I’m Sommer Mathis, the editor-in-chief of City Monitor. Hello!

My background includes having served as the founding editor of CityLab, editor-in-chief of Atlas Obscura, and editor-in-chief of DCist, a local news publication in the District of Columbia. I’ve been reporting on and writing about cities in one way or another for the past 15 years. To me, there is no more important story in the world right now than how cities are changing and adapting to an increasingly challenging global landscape. The majority of the world’s population lives in cities, and if we’re ever going to be able to tackle the most pressing issues currently facing our planet – the climate emergency, rising inequality, the Covid-19 pandemic ­­­– cities are going to have to lead the way.

That’s why City Monitor is now a global publication dedicated to the future of cities everywhere – not just in the UK (nor for that matter just in the US, where I live). Our mission is to help our readers, many of whom are in leadership positions around the globe, navigate how cities are changing and discover what’s next in the world of urban policy. We’ll do that through original reporting, expert opinion and most crucially, a data-driven approach that emphasises evidence and rigorous analysis. We want to arm local decision-makers and those they work in concert with – whether that’s elected officials, bureaucratic leaders, policy advocates, neighbourhood activists, academics and researchers, entrepreneurs, or plain-old engaged citizens – with real insights and potential answers to tough problems. Subjects we cover include transportation, infrastructure, housing, urban design, public safety, the environment, the economy, and much more.

The City Monitor team is made up of some of the most experienced urban policy journalists in the world. Our managing editor is Adam Sneed, also a CityLab alum where he served as a senior associate editor. Before that he was a technology reporter at Politico. Allison Arieff is City Monitor’s senior editor. She was previously editorial director of the urban planning and policy think tank SPUR, as well as a contributing columnist for The New York Times. Staff writer Jake Blumgart most recently covered development, housing and politics for WHYY, the local public radio station in Philadelphia. And our data reporter is Alexandra Kanik, whose previous roles include data reporting for Louisville Public Media in Kentucky and PublicSource in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Our team will continue to grow in the coming weeks, and we’ll also be collaborating closely with our editorial colleagues across New Statesman Media Group. In fact, we’re launching a whole network of new publications, covering topics such as the clean energy transition, foreign direct investment, technology, banks and more. Many of these sectors will frequently overlap with our cities coverage, and a key part of our plan is make the most of the expertise that all of these newsrooms combined will bring to bear on our journalism.

Please visit citymonitor.ai going forward, where you can also sign up for our free email newsletter.


As for CityMetric, some of its archives have already been moved over to the new website, and the rest will follow not long after. If you’re looking for a favourite piece from CityMetric’s past, for a time you’ll still be able to find it here, but before long the whole archive will move over to City Monitor.

On behalf of the City Monitor team, I’m thrilled to invite you to come along for the ride at our new digs. You can follow City Monitor on LinkedIn and on Twitter. If you’re interested in learning more about the potential for a commercial partnership with City Monitor, please get in touch with our director of partnerships, Joe Maughan.

I want to thank and congratulate Jonn Elledge on a brilliant run. Everything we do from here on out will be building on the legacy of his work, and the community that he built here at CityMetric. Cheers, Jonn!

To our readers, on behalf of the City Monitor team, thank you from all of us for being such loyal CityMetric fans. We couldn’t have done any of this without you.

Sommer Mathis is editor-in-chief of City Monitor.