Reopening London’s mail rail: on the thrill of urban ruins

London's mail rail, not quite in action. Image: Getty.

London’s Post Office Railway – colloquially known as the mail rail – is buried 70 feet under the city and stretches over six miles, from Paddington in the north-west to Whitechapel in the east. For over 75 years, tiny driverless trains called mini-yorks cruised at a breezy 40mph down its narrow gauge rails to transport 4m parcels a day across the capital.

But in 2003, the Post Office mothballed it. And it didn’t take long for the railway to recede in urban memory, a buried presence haunting the junction of history and myth.

From 2008 to 2013, I was deeply embroiled in research with a group of urban explorers in London. The infamous London Consolidation Crew (LCC) climbed the Shard before it was complete, took photos of every abandoned tube station in the city and traced all of London’s lost rivers. But throughout years of searching, the mail rail continued to elude us.

Finally, in the summer of 2011, good research and persistence finally paid off – an entry point was located. For four days, explorers walked every inch of track and photographed every train and junction in the system. Releasing the photos and stories of the mail rail exploration was a remarkable moment; as millions of hits crashed our blogs, I imagined citizens of the capital falling asleep that night dreaming of London’s hidden secret underworld.

A growing fascination

Interest in ruins seems to have snowballed over the past decade. People have become fascinated by the lived histories that ruins harbour, by the unique sensory and aesthetic qualities of abandoned spaces and – I think more than anything – by the memento mori they perform. Being in a ruin, surrounded by a bewildering amalgam of decay and rebirth, reminds us that we too will die and that future things will be born of us. In other words, ruins put us in our place.

A mail rail mini-york. Image: Alastair Batchelor/author provided.

One of my research participants, Statler, explained to me what it felt like to walk through the mail rail: “It was hot, sweaty, dank, wet... It smelt like a mouldering hospital in parts and was pretty cramped in the tunnels... There were also a lot of calcium stalactites that would snap off in your face and hair it was obvious that people hadn’t been in the tunnels for a very long time.”

Imagine the feeling of walking through a great feat of human engineering like the mail rail: a secret, forbidden zone – a ruin-in-progress. Imagine the silence of the place, the feeling that you are surrounded by unresolved history. Imagine nature sluggishly swallowing the tunnels, where you can see calcification will eventually connect the top of the tunnel to the tracks.

Imagine sitting in a mini-york, even starting it up and nudging it forward a bit down the creaking rails under Clerkenwell, where thousands of people are stumbling past at street level on their way home from a night out, totally unaware that this implausible adventure is unravelling 70 feet below them. Imagine climbing out of the hole in the ground at dawn with a memory card full of images that the world had not been seen for years. That is why the LCC pursued the mail rail for so long: because it was the perfect ruin.

New attractions

Soon you will be able to see the mail rail for yourself; the Post Office has announced that they will be opening it to visitors in 2017. I am delighted that the public will finally be able to see the system, and the new Postal Museum that’s been proposed will be a welcome addition to London’s formidable heritage landscape. However, for your £9 (£14.50 if you want to ride the train), you will only see a small part of the system, and you would be hard pressed to call it an adventure.

Adventure time? Image: The Postal Museum.

And of course, it will no longer be a secret or a ruin – the two most alluring aspects of the place will have been exorcised. They have announced that two new mini-yorks will be built for the “ride”, prompting me to wonder whether what we visit in 2017 will be the mail rail at all – or rather a Disneyfied profit-driven imitation for tourists.

It is likely that the actions of urban explorers played a role in the decision to create the museum; whether it was by sparking the public’s imagination, or in prompting the Post Office to take action, once they realised what an appetite there was for stories of the urban underground. I just hope they don’t do the legendary system a disservice as a result.

For those heritage enthusiasts who prefer a more visceral connection to the past, rumour has it that a pneumatic underground railway was used by the Post Office in London between 1863 and 1874 – a precursor to the mail rail. There’s also an identical, and even older, mail rail in Chicago awaiting rediscovery. Even as parts of our urban heritage are opened to the public, mysteries like these will keep driving explorers deeper into the urban underground.The Conversation


Bradley L Garrett is a lecturer in human geography at the University of Southampton.

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.

 
 
 
 

CityMetric is now City Monitor! Come see us at our new home

City Monitor is now live in beta at citymonitor.ai.

CityMetric is now City Monitor, a name that reflects both a ramping up of our ambitions as well as our membership in a network of like-minded publications from New Statesman Media Group. Our new site is now live in beta, so please visit us there going forward. Here’s what CityMetric readers should know about this exciting transition.  

Regular CityMetric readers may have already noticed a few changes around here since the spring. CityMetric’s beloved founding editor, Jonn Elledge, has moved on to some new adventures, and a new team has formed to take the site into the future. It’s led by yours truly – I’m Sommer Mathis, the editor-in-chief of City Monitor. Hello!

My background includes having served as the founding editor of CityLab, editor-in-chief of Atlas Obscura, and editor-in-chief of DCist, a local news publication in the District of Columbia. I’ve been reporting on and writing about cities in one way or another for the past 15 years. To me, there is no more important story in the world right now than how cities are changing and adapting to an increasingly challenging global landscape. The majority of the world’s population lives in cities, and if we’re ever going to be able to tackle the most pressing issues currently facing our planet – the climate emergency, rising inequality, the Covid-19 pandemic ­­­– cities are going to have to lead the way.

That’s why City Monitor is now a global publication dedicated to the future of cities everywhere – not just in the UK (nor for that matter just in the US, where I live). Our mission is to help our readers, many of whom are in leadership positions around the globe, navigate how cities are changing and discover what’s next in the world of urban policy. We’ll do that through original reporting, expert opinion and most crucially, a data-driven approach that emphasises evidence and rigorous analysis. We want to arm local decision-makers and those they work in concert with – whether that’s elected officials, bureaucratic leaders, policy advocates, neighbourhood activists, academics and researchers, entrepreneurs, or plain-old engaged citizens – with real insights and potential answers to tough problems. Subjects we cover include transportation, infrastructure, housing, urban design, public safety, the environment, the economy, and much more.

The City Monitor team is made up of some of the most experienced urban policy journalists in the world. Our managing editor is Adam Sneed, also a CityLab alum where he served as a senior associate editor. Before that he was a technology reporter at Politico. Allison Arieff is City Monitor’s senior editor. She was previously editorial director of the urban planning and policy think tank SPUR, as well as a contributing columnist for The New York Times. Staff writer Jake Blumgart most recently covered development, housing and politics for WHYY, the local public radio station in Philadelphia. And our data reporter is Alexandra Kanik, whose previous roles include data reporting for Louisville Public Media in Kentucky and PublicSource in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Our team will continue to grow in the coming weeks, and we’ll also be collaborating closely with our editorial colleagues across New Statesman Media Group. In fact, we’re launching a whole network of new publications, covering topics such as the clean energy transition, foreign direct investment, technology, banks and more. Many of these sectors will frequently overlap with our cities coverage, and a key part of our plan is make the most of the expertise that all of these newsrooms combined will bring to bear on our journalism.

Please visit citymonitor.ai going forward, where you can also sign up for our free email newsletter.


As for CityMetric, some of its archives have already been moved over to the new website, and the rest will follow not long after. If you’re looking for a favourite piece from CityMetric’s past, for a time you’ll still be able to find it here, but before long the whole archive will move over to City Monitor.

On behalf of the City Monitor team, I’m thrilled to invite you to come along for the ride at our new digs. You can follow City Monitor on LinkedIn and on Twitter. If you’re interested in learning more about the potential for a commercial partnership with City Monitor, please get in touch with our director of partnerships, Joe Maughan.

I want to thank and congratulate Jonn Elledge on a brilliant run. Everything we do from here on out will be building on the legacy of his work, and the community that he built here at CityMetric. Cheers, Jonn!

To our readers, on behalf of the City Monitor team, thank you from all of us for being such loyal CityMetric fans. We couldn’t have done any of this without you.

Sommer Mathis is editor-in-chief of City Monitor.